{"id":631,"date":"2008-12-14T16:20:38","date_gmt":"2008-12-14T15:20:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/?p=631"},"modified":"2008-12-06T15:12:22","modified_gmt":"2008-12-06T14:12:22","slug":"top-secret-so-why-did-council-post-details-of-high-security-spy-centre-on-the-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/journalism\/top-secret-so-why-did-council-post-details-of-high-security-spy-centre-on-the-internet\/","title":{"rendered":"Top secret &#8230; so why did council post details of high security spy centre on the internet?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Top secret &#8230; so why did council post details of high security spy centre on the internet?<\/h4>\n<p class=\"note\">\nBy Jason Lewis<br \/>\nLast updated at 10:06 PM on 29th November 2008\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>Details of one of Britain&#8217;s most sensitive spy centres have been revealed in official documents posted on the internet by a local council.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Whitehall security officials have raised serious concerns after the authority published a planning file revealing the &#8216;national security&#8217; role of the development.<\/p>\n<p>The major blunder means that the full details of what is believed to be a covert MI5 operations centre &#8211; used to share intelligence with MI6 and GCHQ &#8211; are now in the public domain.<\/p>\n<p>The documents include plans of the building and details of its sophisticated &#8216;anti-intruder measures&#8217;.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThey also reveal sensitive information about the number of staff &#8211; including security guards &#8211; who will work at the spy centre, as well as its hours of operation and the location of all its security cameras.<\/p>\n<p>Diagrams in the planning file show banks of computer servers, which are understood to form part of a system designed to speed up intelligence-sharing between Britain&#8217;s security agencies.<\/p>\n<p>The project was designed to disguise the giant computer hub by hiding it in an anonymous-looking warehouse in the South-East of England.<\/p>\n<p>But the documents published by the council &#8211; which The Mail on Sunday has decided not to name for security reasons &#8211; show photographs and maps of the building and leave little doubt over what it is being used for.<\/p>\n<p>Emails from the planning officers involved in the decision to give the go-ahead to the massive development also demonstrate the site&#8217;s importance to national security.<\/p>\n<p>A message from a part-time worker in the council&#8217;s planning department explains the sensitivity of the site.<\/p>\n<p>Incredibly, this discussion has been published on the internet.<\/p>\n<p>He says: &#8216;This is essentially a high security data back-up storage centre. The generators are required to maintain power and national security when the mains power supply is not available.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The warehouse will also be used as a service centre for MI5&#8217;s vehicle fleet.<\/p>\n<p>The application was submitted by the Ministry of Defence using an apparently fictitious PO box number for a London postcode that does not exist.<\/p>\n<p>The security blunder was unearthed by Alan Turnbull, who runs an internet site called Secret Bases. This specialises in identifying operations centres used by the security agencies.<\/p>\n<p>He said: &#8216;Details of this highly sensitive site were extraordinarily easy to find. It seems incredible that local officials have published all this material &#8211; apparently without considering the full implications of that decision.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I alerted the Ministry of Defence to what I had found and how easily I found it.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Last night the local council at the centre of the decision to publish the material on the internet said: &#8216;There is a legal requirement that we publish all details of planning applications. We, like many other local authorities, make this information available on the internet.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;It would be down to the applicant themselves to ask for restrictions on what is revealed of their plans.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Neither the applicant nor their agents asked for any restrictions in this case.&#8217;\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"editNote\">\n&lt;&lt;Editors notE&gt;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Denial&#8230; finger pointing&#8230; more denial&#8230; acceptance of the fact&#8230; common knowledge&#8230; denial of the fact they ever denied it&#8230;  <\/p>\n<p>source:: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mailonsunday.co.uk\" title=\"http:\/\/www.mailonsunday.co.uk\" target=\"_blank\">mailonsunday.co.uk<\/a><br \/>\ncopyright&copy;:: Associated Newspapers Ltd  <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Top secret &#8230; so why did council post details of high security spy centre on the internet? By Jason Lewis Last updated at 10:06 PM on 29th November 2008 Details of one of Britain&#8217;s most sensitive spy centres have been revealed in official documents posted on the internet by a local council. Whitehall security officials have raised serious concerns after the authority published a planning file revealing the &#8216;national security&#8217; role of the development. The major blunder means that the full details of what is<strong>&#8230;<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism","category-world"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/ph7OQR-ab","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.psyched.be\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}